About Cambria

Pines by the Sea – Community * Conversation * Information

Browsing Posts tagged 93428

From the North Coast Advisory Council email maven (aka Marty Main):

Hello Everyone:

We want to alert you that John Busselle, SLO County planner, will update the NCAC (North Coast Advisory Council) on the Vacation Rental Ordinance recommended changes to the amendments. If you remember, the Board of Supervisors requested the 5-yr review of the Ordinance. In July 2009, the staff report presented a list of suggested recommendations that would update the Ordinance to be more enforceable in their opinion. We, the residents, presented many of our concerns at that time. And staff actually took some of these suggestions under advisement and incorporated them into their report for recommended changes. The Supervisors listened and then requested staff to go back and rework some of the issues under discussion.

A copy of the ’09 staff report with the original recommendations for changes to the Ordinance is available. John Busselle will be reporting on the updates to these recommendations. Note, the Board has not voted on any changes to date; but is simply gathering information.

The NCAC meeting will be held July 21st at 6:30 pm in the Rabobank meeting room.

Please attend to know what changes the county plans. Also, it is important to give feedback. We, the residents of Cambria, are the only ones who know if these proposed changes will improve the quality of our neighborhoods with regard to the vacation rental home business. The county can make suggestions; but we need to let them know what will work and what are the real issues.

Again, July 21st, NCAC meeting, 6:30 PM, Rabobank meeting room. Please attend.

More valuable than a gallon of gas? Say YES! with a small donation today.

The next meeting of the Cambria Community Services District is Thursday June 24, 2010 at 12:30 at the Veteran’s Memorial Hall. Highlights of the agenda are here, the full agenda is available at cambriacsd.org.

The Water Emergency Alternatives Citizens’ Committee will provide  a progress report on the committee’s work.

The Consent Agenda includes:
A. Approve Expenditures for Month of May 2010
B. Approve Minutes of Board of Directors Meeting, May 27, 2010
C. Consider Adoption of Ordinance 01-2010 Adding Provisions to the CCSD Municipal Code Establishing the Board’s Policy that New Hire Employees Pay 100% of the Employee’s Designated Share of the PERS Retirement Contribution
D. Consider Adoption of Resolution 28-2010 Authorizing Reporting the Payment of Member Contributions to the California Public Employees’
Retirement System for CCSD Management and Confidential Employees (MCE)
E. Consider Adoption of Resolution 29-2010 Approving VanScoyoc Associates Professional Services Agreement
F. Consider Adoption of Resolution 30-2010 Approving AGP Video, Inc. Professional Services Agreement
G. Consider Adoption of Resolution 31-2010 Approving TechExpress Professional Services Information Technology (IT) Agreement

HEARINGS AND APPEALS

A. Conduct Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution 32-2010 Approving the CCSD Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2010/2011

B. Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution 33-2010 Authorizing a 1.9% CPI Adjustment in the Fire Suppression Benefit Assessment

REGULAR BUSINESS
A. Receive Report by Land Conservancy of San Luis Obispo County on Cambria Vacant Parcel Assessment

The whole meeting (not including public comment) is estimated to take an hour and a half. Since they are considering the budget for next year and an increase in the fire benefit assessment, once again the estimated time is unlikely to be the reality. More on the budget when the board packet is available to me.

More valuable than a gallon of gas? Say YES! with a small donation today.

An item was posted on the website FedBizOpps.gov in the category “Opportunities” soliciting interested qualified vendors for Cambria’s “Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation Study”. The solicitation outlines what is expected of the company that gets the business and (as of today 5/5/10) includes 6 interested vendors from as near as Paso Robles and as far as Florida.

Check it out to gain some insight on the process. The on May 10, 2010, watch the California Coastal Commission hearing on the federal consistency determination (if it isn’t postponed for some reason.) Click here to link to the agenda for that meeting.

Water is the hub of Cambria issues. Essential for living things, possessing qualities unique to itself, water is a critical part of the complex systems all over the planet. Tonight’s event will be at Rabobank from 6-8pm. It is billed as an educational and informational evening for Cambrians that will cover a number of topics related to alternative water sources. With so much to know about  the complexity of water management (assuring a reliable supply) and education in short supply, this may become the first of many such events. Tonight’s agenda includes talks from experts on clean water & conservation, greywater systems, storage ponds, and water supply. See the flyer below.

See you there!

More valuable than a gallon of gas? Say YES! with a small donation today.

The agenda packet for this week’s CCSD meeting is available on the Cambria CSD website. It has a lot of interesting information about district business, so I thought I’d include it here. This is directly from the published agenda on the CCSD website.

ADMINISTRATION

LATE FEE WAIVER – 12-MONTH PAYMENT HISTORY REVIEW

Last month, staff met with the former Executive Committee (President Sanders and Vice President Chaldecott) as directed by the Board of Directors concerning the existing policy for allowing waiver of a customer’s late fee if their account is in good standing (no late payments within the preceding 12 months). The discussion among Directors concerned potentially changing policy to require a 24-month good payment history, rather than 12 months.
The existing 12-month payment history requirement has worked effectively these past several years when dealing with customers who, for whatever reason, did not timely pay their bill.
While it is true that there are only six payments within a customer’s 12-month payment history, it is acknowledged that it is reasonable that a payment oversight or error could be made by a customer. A 12-month review of a customer’s account by staff is simple and quick, and customers who have received a waiver appreciate the relief. Moreover, the policy has been even more resourceful during these past couple of years for customers dealing with the economic downturn. The CCSD has more customers on payment plans ever as a result of the poor economy and lost jobs (approximately 30 billing accounts),
but staff is following Board direction and working within existing policies to assist customers in need as best possible.
Therefore, the Executive Committee and staff determined that the 12-month good payment history requirement is reasonable and should not be changed at this time.

VOLUNTARY LOT MERGER PROGRAM

Attached is the quarterly summary report for the CCSD’s Voluntary Lot Merger Program covering activity for April 2007-December 2009, which, unfortunately, again reflects no change in lot merger activity. The program has gone six (6) months with no lot merger activity, and we believe that is because of the increased SLO County costs for the merger process. However, per the Board’s direction and Resolution 62-2009 on December 14, 2009, the program funding
authorization for lot mergers was increased from $200 to $800 per customer, which is a renewed incentive for a property owner. Staff included the attached Voluntary Lot Merger Program flyer with the November/December 2009 utility bills reminding customers, and the same flyer will be mailed to vacant lot owners within the next few weeks.
A $33,000 increase in program revenues was recognized in December 2009 resulting from the EDU conversion and Agreement between the CCSD and Granville Homes, Inc., per Resolution 53-2009 dated October 22, 2009.
A total of 352 lots have been reduced at a cost of $19,987. The BRP (Buildout Reduction Program) goal for reduction by voluntary lot merger was 394 lots, and the program reached 89% of that goal in just two years. As reported to the Board on October 22, 2009, the BRP Citizens Finance Committee revisited its goal for lot mergers and recommended increasing it  (from 40%) to 60% of the 986 “theoretical” lots identified for potential merger by the CCSD’s consultant working with the committee during its original program work, for a new total goal of
592 lots. The next quarterly report will reflect the program’s revised goal of 592 lots.

LITIGATION UPDATE

Attached is a breakdown of litigation costs expended by the CCSD in the four active cases against the CCSD. Remember, these expenditures are limited to research of available electronic records back to 2002. Also, these are TOTAL litigation expenses, not just fiscal year expenditures. The cases are abbreviated and costs rounded as follows:
· Berge–$44,000 (up $12,000 from $32,000 in 10/1/09 GM report);
· Lindsey—$37,000 (up $11,000 from $26,000 in 10/1/09 GM report);
· Warren (Landfill)—$6,000 (up $2,000 from $4,000 in 10/1/09 GM report); and
· Landwatch (Hawley)–$35,000 (up $13,000 from $22,000 in 10/1/09 GM report).

Berge v. CCSD

A judgment from the Second District Court of Appeals is expected any day now. While Mr. Berge has busied himself contacting other public agencies around SLO County and other jurisdictions that he has been successful in his appeal against the CCSD, the court’s judgment outlining its determination has not been released. Mr. Berge has sued the CCSD five (5) times within the past decade, and the CCSD has been victorious each time.

Lindsey v. CCSD

The writ proceeding in SLO Superior Court is scheduled for a continued case management  conference on May 10, 2010. The adversary proceeding against CCSD by Joseph and Mary Lindsey in US Bankruptcy Court is scheduled for initial status conference on January 26, 2010.

Warren v. CCSD

SDRMA has expended $96,000 in defense costs for the Warren (Landfill) case. The Warren v. CCSD case has been settled and the settlement documents have been finalized among all parties. A continued case management conference is scheduled in SLO Superior Court on February 11, 2010, within which it is expected the settlement will be approved by the court.
The SDRMA will make its $5,000 settlement payment on behalf of the CCSD once all signatures are obtained on the settlement and release documents.

Landwatch (Hawley) v. CCSD

A settlement offer by Mrs. Cynthia Hawley of Landwatch was rejected by the CCSD because it was merely a repeat of the claims made in their lawsuit. The case is set for case management conference on January 25, 2010, in SLO Superior Court. The case has been reassigned to Judge Martin Tangeman.

Small Claims Court*

The CCSD was successful recently in Small Claims Court with a couple of cases filed by Barbara Owen and Dianne Kennedy against the CCSD for water damages resulting from a fire hydrant located at Wilton and Latham that was damaged on 4/20/09 by a “hit and run” driver. The court determined the CCSD is not responsible for any damages as a result of the incident.
Furthermore, the CCSD and SDRMA settled another fire hydrant matter (at Berwick and Wales on 5/31/08) before pursuing in Small Claims Court, wherein the CCSD received insurance company payments from the responsible parties for the vehicle accident damages (replacement hydrant, staff time, and materials) totaling $2,700.
*For matters in Small Claims Court, attorney appearances are not authorized; therefore, the CCSD General Manager represents the CCSD in court.

DISTRICT COUNSEL LEGAL SERVICES/LITIGATION EXPENSES

The attached spreadsheet updates the District Counsel legal services/litigation expenses paid during the first half of the FY 2009/2010 (July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009). To summarize from my October 1, 2009, report to the Board:
§ I manage the District Counsel contract, and review and approve all invoices for District Counsel legal services/litigation expenses.
§ The contractual monthly retainer that the CCSD pays to Carmel & Naccasha for District Counsel legal services is $6,600 for 40 hours. This is offset after actual monthly services are rendered and tallied, with excess fees paid if more is due or credit balance forwarded in their next billing if there is a balance due the CCSD.
§ I work very close with the Carmel & Naccasha attorneys on the litigation  matters, and I am aware that they are extremely conscientious with their services and expenditures rendered on behalf of the CCSD. The CCSD is not the only public agency they represent during these lean economic times.
§ District Counsel legal/litigation expenses are budgeted within the “Professional Services” line item in each CCSD department.
§ FY 2009/2010 budget projections for litigation services are our “best estimates,” based upon experience from the litigation team and management.
§ Current litigation expenses are for defending actions filed against the CCSD.
The attached spreadsheet shows the FY 2009/2010 budget versus actual Costs broken down by CCSD department for “District Counsel” legal services and “Litigation” services. The analysis also reflects the YTD timing expired (July-December 2009), or 50% of the fiscal year, and the relationship between the invoiced amounts paid compared with the approved budget.
The actual “District Counsel” expenditures for general legal services for the first half of the fiscal year total $43,465, which represents 54.5% of the budgeted total of $79,800. While a bit higher than the expected 50% FY time expiration, staff believes it to be manageable within the budget projection.
Actual expenditures for District Counsel “Litigation” services total $36,627, which represents 73.3% of the budgeted total of $50,000. This is obviously higher than our “best estimate” budget projection for the FY time expired, however, one case is settled (Warren v. CCSD), and another has gone through trial and appeal, and awaiting judgment (Berge v. CCSD). Minimal services are expected to be rendered as a result of litigation closure on these matters. CCSD litigation services for the remainder of the fiscal year will primarily center on trial
preparation for the two remaining actions against the CCSD—Lindsey v. CCSD and Landwatch (Hawley) v. CCSD. With a total budget balance of $13,000 for District Counsel litigation services, staff recommends a mid-year increase of $15,000 to cover for the remainder of FY 2009/2010. The Lindsey and Landwatch lawsuits center around water related issues, item. A mid-year review of the FY 2009/2010 will occur in an agenda item today.

CYBERNET CONSULTING, INC. – SCADA SETTLEMENT

Per the Board’s Resolution 58-2009 and direction on December 14, 2009, the SCADA Settlement and Release Agreement has been fully executed and satisfied. The settlement check was delivered to Cybernet and the CCSD simultaneously received the related project documents/reports and system programming passwords/wiring diagrams.

FEDERAL ADVOCATE – VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES

The December monthly report from the CCSD federal advocate is attached.

MISSION COUNTRY DISPOSAL 2010 CLEANUP DAYS

Mission Country Disposal’s annual cleanup days for 2010 are as follows:
Spring Cleanup is scheduled for April 26-30, 2010; and  Fall Cleanup is scheduled for September 27-October 1, 2010.
During this time, extra recycling, green waste, and garbage is allowed on a customer’s regular pickup day. Larger items such as appliances, mattresses, and furniture require advance arrangements are made with Mission Country for pickup and a nominal fee.

HOLIDAY NOTICE

CCSD administrative offices and utility field operations will be closed on Monday, February 15, 2010, in observance of Presidents’ Day. Service interruptions and emergencies may be reported by calling our 24-hour answering service at 927-6223.

PARKS AND RECREATION

PROS COMMISSION

The PROS (Parks, Recreation and Open Space) Commission met at 10:00 a.m., on Tuesday, January 5, 2010. The Commission’s next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 2, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., at the Cambria Vets Hall (Dining Room).

FRP MANAGEMENT PLAN

The corresponding changes necessary to the Fiscalini Ranch Preserve Management Plan will be delayed until next month’s regular meeting, as a result of workload prioritization.

1. OPENING
A. Call to Order
B. Pledge of Allegiance
C. Establishment of Quorum
D. Report from Closed Session
2. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Members of the public may now address the Board on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of the Board but not on its agenda today. In compliance with the Brown Act, the Board cannot discuss or act on items not on the agenda. Each speaker has up to three minutes. Speaker slips (available at the entry) should be submitted to the District Clerk.
3. AGENDA REVIEW: ADDITIONS/DELETIONS AND PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
(Estimated Time: 5 minutes)
4. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
5. SPECIAL REPORTS
A. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT REPORT
(Estimated Time: 5 minutes)

6. MANAGER’S AND BOARD REPORTS
A. MANAGER’S REPORT
(Estimated Time: 10 minutes)
B. MEMBER AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
(Estimated Time: 10 minutes)
7. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters on the consent calendar are to be approved by one motion. If  Directors wish to discuss a consent item other than simple clarifying questions, a request for removal may be made. Such items are pulled for separate discussion and action after the consent calendar as a whole is acted upon.
A. Approve Expenditures for Month of December 2009
B. Approve Minutes of Board of Directors Meeting, December 14, 2009 and January 5, 2010
(Estimated Time: 15 minutes)
8. HEARINGS AND APPEALS
A. Consider Adoption of Resolution 07-2010 Approving Management Recommendations to Resolve Impasse in Labor Negotiations Between the CCSD and Cambria Firefighters/IAFF (International Association of Firefighters) Local 4635, and Establishing Terms and Conditions of  Employment for the IAFF Members; Consider Adoption of Resolution 08- 2010 Reporting the Payment of Member Contributions to the California
Public Employees’ Retirement System; and Consider Adoption of Resolution 09-2010 for Employer Pick-Up – IRC 414(H)(2)
(Estimated Time: 30 minutes)
9. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. Receive DRAFT Audit Fiscal Year 2008-2009
B. Consider Adoption of Resolution 02-2010 Approving Mid-Year Revision to Fiscal Year 2009/2010 CCSD Operating Budget
C. Consider Adoption of Resolution 03-2010 Approving Van Scoyoc Associates Professional Services Agreement

D. Consider Adoption of Resolution 04-2010 Ratifying Confidential Non-Exempt Positions and Side Letter No. 2 to Amended Payment and
Compensation Plan for Management and Confidential Employees
E. Consider Adoption of Resolution 05-2010 Approving Appointment of Parks and Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Commissioners and Resolution 06-2010 Approving Appointment of Ex Officio Members
F. Consider Request for Nominations for LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) Special District Member
G. Review and Approve 2010 Board Committee Assignments
(Estimated Time: 60 minutes)
10. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public may now address the Board on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of the Board but not on its agenda today. In compliance with the Brown Act, the Board cannot discuss or act on items not on the agenda. Each speaker has up to three minutes. Speaker slips (available at the entry) should be submitted to the District Clerk.
11. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION pursuant to periodic performance evaluation as required by employment contract.
Title: General Manager

More valuable than a gallon of gas? Say YES! with a small donation today.

At the last regular Cambria Community Services District meeting of 2009 the Board chose it’s new leaders. Bucking the usual tradition of selecting the Vice President to be the next president, Muril Clift nominated current board president Greg Sanders to continue in that role. Director Sanders didn’t refuse the nomination and was unanimously elected to serve for 2010 as the Board president.
Then Director MacKinnon nominated Director Chaldecott for Vice Chair, citing the logic of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. When there was no second to his motion, Director DeMicco nominated Director Clift for Vice Chair. His reasoning included ensuring the Executive committee becoming more balanced between the experience of Sanders and the fiscal responsibility represented by the recently elected Clift. It almost appeared that DeMicco’s motion would also die for lack of a second when Director Chaldecott quietly seconded Clift’s nomination.
Director Sanders responded “Always the gentleman, Peter.” It was hard to hear exactly what Chaldecott said in response, but the gist of it seemed to be that choosing Clift as Vise president would ensure some continuity, since he would be retiring at the end of 2010. Chaldecott’s term is up in 2010 and he apparently isn’t planning a run next year.
The president and vice president make up the executive committee of the Cambria Community Services District. This committee sets the agendas for the monthly meetings and provides much of the direction for what policies the Board will consider over the year.
Whether or not you agree with Sanders or Clift on individual matters, I think these two men will serve the community well in 2010. The monthly meetings are professional and usually run smoothly by president Sanders. Unlike other Board presidents, Sanders allows some latitude in time available for public comment and manages the action expertly. Clift has shown strong political acumen in his year and a half on the CSD and we will benefit from his ability to ask the right questions at the right time.
More on the rest of the meeting (which was packed for the Army Corps of Engineers presentation) in tomorrow’s post.

More valuable than a gallon of gas? Say YES! with a small donation today.

At the November 2009 Cambria Community Services District Meeting, two speakers raised concern that San Simeon is in talks with the CCSD about buying some of the desalinated water from Cambria’s plant – once it is producing water.

In November 2006, 78% of Cambrians approved Measure P-06. Below is the exact language from the League of Women Voters site:

Shall the ordinance requiring a majority vote of the electorate of the Cambria Community Services District to provide potable water service outside the 2006 District boundaries be adopted? The Board of Directors shall not authorize the extension of water service except non potable water for agricultural and irrigation purposes for outside of the District boundaries, as the boundaries exist at the enactment of this ordinance, for residential, industrial, or commercial purposes without first completing environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act or its successor statute, amending the Water Master Plan, and then submitting the question for approval to the voters of the District. The property owner seeking water service will pay the costs of the application and election in advance.

A few thoughts occur as I’ve thought about how possessive some people seem to be about “our” water.

  1. It is premature to be concerned about this at this point. It hasn’t even been shown that desalination is even feasible here.
  2. Second, Measure P-06 does not forbid selling water outside the boundaries of the CCSD, just providing water service (except non potable…)
  3. As a federally-funded project with the Army Corps of Engineers as the lead agency, the project funding could hinge on whether or not we will sell water to San Simeon, a water-short community less than 7 miles from a major federal project.
  4. San Simeon may decide it is worth the money and effort to apply for water service and fund the election required.
  5. CCSD wouldn’t be giving the water away for free. They would be selling it. If CCSD charges the amount it costs to create the potable water, it will not cost Cambrians anything.
  6. By getting the San Simeon Community Services District in talks this early, we are more likely to be able to strike a deal that includes having San Simeon paying a share of the construction costs, which reduces the burden on Cambrians (and could increase the likelihood that we will get all the funding we need from the Federal Government.)

I favor better management of our current resources, rather than impressive capital expenditures, ongoing operations costs and the  environmental effects of a desal plant. But the CCSD Board is on the desalination path (for the time being).  If we are going to create a project with the environmental effects of a desalination plant, it seems to me that cooperating with San Simeon to help ease their water shortage, while reducing some of the potential costs to Cambrians is a sensible direction to follow.

Quite a few things have to happen before we should need to get all worked up about San Simeon getting “our” water, starting with determining whether we can even have desal.  And then San Simeon will have to decide whether it would be worth it for them to pursue. If the past is any indication, getting a deal in place between the two agencies will be next to impossible anyway.

The bottom line: “Worrying is like a rocking chair, it gives you something to do, but it doesn’t get you anywhere” – Unknown

Shall the ordinance requiring a majority vote of the electorate of the Cambria Community Services District to provide potable water service outside the 2006 District boundaries be adopted?
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.

Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Full Text of Measure P-06
The Board of Directors shall not authorize the extension of water service except non potable water for agricultural and irrigation purposes for outside of the District boundaries, as the boundaries exist at the enactment of this ordinance, for residential, industrial, or commercial purposes without first completing environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act or its successor statute, amending the Water Master Plan, and then submitting the question for approval to the voters of the District. The property owner seeking water service will pay the costs of the application and election in advance.

Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD) is pursuing desalination as a supplemental supply for their customers. As in Cambria, there is vigorous debate over whether that is an appropriate solution for Marin.  In August,  James Fryer, Environmental Scientist and author of Sustaining Our Water Future wrote a paper entitled Water Supply Reliability and Catastrophic Planning Considerations that Cambrians may find interesting and familiar.

Fryer writes

There is a clear lack of consensus on the need to move forward with further effort and investment in developing a desalination facility. Continued investment in desalination with the present lack of consensus  will result in further conflict with a large portion of ratepayers which will create a diversion from focusing resources on viable water supply reliability and infrastructure improvements that have widespread consensus.

Fryer suggests the MMWD Board and a specially formed Citizen’s Advisory Council  work on resolving some specific policy issues:

  • What is the future water supply deficit and what future growth projections are reasonable for MMWD and NMWD?
  • Should carbon footprint reduction be used to offset large new energy uses or the existing footprint?
  • Is the $1,631/af marginal cost use in the MMWD conservation master plan a valid comparison point for conservation planning compared to the $2,900 to $4,400 marginal cost of desalination?
  • What is the definition of conservation first? Does this really mean simultaneous with desalination?
  • What is basis of a potential decision to move forward with desalination despite compelling evidence it is not needed?

These issues have significant bearing on water supply reliability planning and each should be specifically addressed before moving forward with a decision on desalination….

But an important question remains, what if Marin experiences a 3+ year severe drought event that far exceeds any drought event on record or detected in the 400 year tree ring analysis of local weather conditions? Is this a potential catastrophic event the MMWD Board should be considering and is it justified to approve a major capital investment of hundreds of millions of dollars for a desalination facility only needed for this type of unprecedented event?

The rest of the paper looks at planning for several different catastrophic events, including  comparison of a full range of relevant possibilities. This would enable the MMWD Board to allocate limited financial resources to preparing for the most likely events, instead of laying out huge sums chasing solutions for events extremely unlikely or completely unprecedented.

In Fryer’s words:

“First, it is important to briefly define and examine each type of catastrophic event. Then the individual events should be ranked for each category of risk and impact. Finally, the four types of catastrophic events should be ranked against each other.”

Read the full paper by downloading it here.

Let’s remember we are not alone in the world. We can learn from other communities – and should.

More valuable than a gallon of gas? Say YES! with a small donation today.

The agenda packet for the Cambria Community Services District meeting for this week is a hefty 368 pages. Download it from the CCSD website.

The agenda has a new preamble explaining the legal rules and restrictions of the Board. I applaud this change for a few reasons, but mainly because it may help “regular” citizens understand better what actions the Board can and cannot take at a meeting, relative to the published agenda.

This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the District’s Board of Directors has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each item. In addition to any action identified in the summary description of each item, the action that may be taken by the Board of Directors shall include: a referral to staff with specific requests for information; continuance; specific direction to staff concerning the policy or mission of the item; discontinuance of  consideration;cauthorization to enter into negotiations and execute agreements pertaining to the item; adoption or approval; and disapproval.
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file in the Office of the District Clerk, available for public inspection during District business hours. If requested, the agenda and supporting documents shall be made available in alternative formats to persons with a disability. The District Clerk will answer any questions regarding the agenda.

This week’s agenda includes the usual pledge of allegiance, report from closed session, public comment periods near the beginning and end of the meeting, sheriff’s report, etc. Also this week:

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Cambria Forest Committee Member Galen Rathbun, Presentation of “County and State Codes, Related to Habitat and Fire Protection in Cambria”

MANAGER’S AND BOARD REPORTS

  1. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
  2. DISTRICT ENGINEER UPDATE REPORT ON DESAL PROJECT COSTS

REGULAR BUSINESS

A. Consider Adoption of Resolution 51-2009 Approving Amendment to Settlement, Mutual Release and Covenant Agreement with Joshua Brown and Cathie Brown
B. Consider Adoption of Resolution 53-2009 Approving Agreement Between the CCSD and Granville Homes, Inc., for Conversion of Two EDUs toSingle Family Residential Allocated to 5860 Moonstone Beach Drive (Moonstone Inn) Property
C. Consider Adoption of Resolution 50-2009 Approving Certification of Fiscalini Ranch Preserve Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR); and Consider Adoption of Resolution 54-2009 Approving the Revised Community Park Plan

The closed session agenda is rather full,  too.

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 (2 matters) Barbara Owen, Claimant; Cybernet Consulting, Inc.
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9 (1 matter) Landwatch/C Hawley San Luis Obispo County vs CCSD and DOEs 1 through 25 (inclusive), Army Corps of Engineers and DOEs 21 through 30 (inclusive) Real Parties in Interest CV-09-00928 GAF (RZx)
C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency Designated Representatives: General Manager Employee Organizations: IAFF, Local 4635, Cambria CSD
D. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency Designated Representatives: General Manager Employee Organizations: SEIU, Local 620, Cambria CSD

See you Thursday starting at 12:30pm at the Veteran’s Hall.