<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Question of Services and Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/</link>
	<description>Pines by the Sea - Community * Conversation * Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Berge</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-31109</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Berge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=2279#comment-31109</guid>
		<description>Amanda and Deryl:

Oral arguments on the UnClog appeal are now set for October 28th, 2009 in Santa Barbara. 

After the dust has settled in the reply and opposition briefs, the question before the court comes down to &quot;are we potential users&quot; vs. the new legislative intent of the certified LCP, urban and water master plans. The court rulings in the prior actions were that we were potential users of water and sewer in the prior cases.

The County and the Coastal Commission stated that it was &quot;obvious immediate&quot; that Ordinance 2-2000 closed the wait list only to allow future connections to come from a CCSD wait list position holder.  The County and the CCSD position is not consistent with the prior rulings which occured two years after the ordinance was adopted.

The updated LCP, along with the adopted CCSD Urban and Water Master Plans which limit additional development to 4650 once the desalination plant (new water source) comes on line memorializes that the County, conditioned by the CCC, is using police power to limit any more future development on presently vacant lots, except those on the districts wait list.

This adopted legislative intent will limit the appellate court in this ruling.  It will be interesting how the court interprets the new legislation against the prior rulings.  Either way, it will have a significant impact on the community of Cambria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda and Deryl:</p>
<p>Oral arguments on the UnClog appeal are now set for October 28th, 2009 in Santa Barbara. </p>
<p>After the dust has settled in the reply and opposition briefs, the question before the court comes down to &#8220;are we potential users&#8221; vs. the new legislative intent of the certified LCP, urban and water master plans. The court rulings in the prior actions were that we were potential users of water and sewer in the prior cases.</p>
<p>The County and the Coastal Commission stated that it was &#8220;obvious immediate&#8221; that Ordinance 2-2000 closed the wait list only to allow future connections to come from a CCSD wait list position holder.  The County and the CCSD position is not consistent with the prior rulings which occured two years after the ordinance was adopted.</p>
<p>The updated LCP, along with the adopted CCSD Urban and Water Master Plans which limit additional development to 4650 once the desalination plant (new water source) comes on line memorializes that the County, conditioned by the CCC, is using police power to limit any more future development on presently vacant lots, except those on the districts wait list.</p>
<p>This adopted legislative intent will limit the appellate court in this ruling.  It will be interesting how the court interprets the new legislation against the prior rulings.  Either way, it will have a significant impact on the community of Cambria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-30953</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=2279#comment-30953</guid>
		<description>Flush toilets are for communities with unlimited water supply. Composting toilets make sense for Cambria! Sleek, low-maintenance composting toilets have been available for years. We can be leaders in water conservation and decrease our water bills.

&quot;Composting toilet systems do not require
water for flushing, and thus, reduce
domestic water consumption.&quot;

Are we just too lazy? Incapable? Fearful of taking responsibility for learning to live more simply? Fearful of regulators whose policies promote continued excess?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flush toilets are for communities with unlimited water supply. Composting toilets make sense for Cambria! Sleek, low-maintenance composting toilets have been available for years. We can be leaders in water conservation and decrease our water bills.</p>
<p>&#8220;Composting toilet systems do not require<br />
water for flushing, and thus, reduce<br />
domestic water consumption.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are we just too lazy? Incapable? Fearful of taking responsibility for learning to live more simply? Fearful of regulators whose policies promote continued excess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannine Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-30362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannine Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=2279#comment-30362</guid>
		<description>If a property does not align with the sewer pipeline, then the county should allow that owner the option of compost toilets.  These toilets are remarkable, today, in that they supply a high nitrogen fertilizer from one&#039;s own waste, for the garden.  It is quite sustainable, and has been proven to save the pollution levels of Lake Erie, after only ten percent of the population converted over to them.  When the SLO permits office was asked by me about their valid inclusion, they claimed that the public wouldn&#039;t go for them due to their clunky look.  Well, designs have been streamlined.  Our town should lead the way in domestic sustainability.  Can we get a sign-up sheet with the wait list?

As far as growth, I think that Cambria can afford to grow up, on Main Street, and there abouts.  To have sqwelched the Bicycle Museum at the former Ian&#039;s Restaurant location was a mistake.  

On the matter of desal focus, my friend Jim Brownell, a soil consultant and bright man, has suggested that it would be less expensive and more feasible for us to filter the non-potable water for water use, as opposed to sea water.  Since most people use water filters and bottled water for their drinking water, anyway, that would make great sense.  It would also encourage our town to use better detergents, since the aftermath would be returning to their sink.  Now, we must rely upon one&#039;s compassion for the fish, which is sorely delinquent.

Another plan to discourage Cambria&#039;s growth would be to begin a well planned hub of a new village around the area of HWY 46 and HWY One.  If the County could begin to re-classify that region, with allowances for the Red Legged Frog habitats, then our village could retain a moratorium or 1% growth cap, even with the new water system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a property does not align with the sewer pipeline, then the county should allow that owner the option of compost toilets.  These toilets are remarkable, today, in that they supply a high nitrogen fertilizer from one&#8217;s own waste, for the garden.  It is quite sustainable, and has been proven to save the pollution levels of Lake Erie, after only ten percent of the population converted over to them.  When the SLO permits office was asked by me about their valid inclusion, they claimed that the public wouldn&#8217;t go for them due to their clunky look.  Well, designs have been streamlined.  Our town should lead the way in domestic sustainability.  Can we get a sign-up sheet with the wait list?</p>
<p>As far as growth, I think that Cambria can afford to grow up, on Main Street, and there abouts.  To have sqwelched the Bicycle Museum at the former Ian&#8217;s Restaurant location was a mistake.  </p>
<p>On the matter of desal focus, my friend Jim Brownell, a soil consultant and bright man, has suggested that it would be less expensive and more feasible for us to filter the non-potable water for water use, as opposed to sea water.  Since most people use water filters and bottled water for their drinking water, anyway, that would make great sense.  It would also encourage our town to use better detergents, since the aftermath would be returning to their sink.  Now, we must rely upon one&#8217;s compassion for the fish, which is sorely delinquent.</p>
<p>Another plan to discourage Cambria&#8217;s growth would be to begin a well planned hub of a new village around the area of HWY 46 and HWY One.  If the County could begin to re-classify that region, with allowances for the Red Legged Frog habitats, then our village could retain a moratorium or 1% growth cap, even with the new water system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Washburn</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-29910</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Washburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=2279#comment-29910</guid>
		<description>The complexities of the Unclog lawsuit make it difficult to easily understand the impact to Cambria residents.  The bottom line is that they hold potential liability as both SLO county residents and from their financial responsibilites to the CCSD (they are the CCSD&#039;s funding source).  The UNCLOG Cambria letter cited above offers a unique way out for the county to their dilema - and it might save the CCSD (read: Cambria  residents) unnecessary expenses also.  It unfortunately is past the time for Cambrians to realize just how large their liabilty might be if they continue to ignore the facts, but now be the time to wake up.  We all must wait to see what happens with the UNCLOG appeal - should the CCSD inform us better about this situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The complexities of the Unclog lawsuit make it difficult to easily understand the impact to Cambria residents.  The bottom line is that they hold potential liability as both SLO county residents and from their financial responsibilites to the CCSD (they are the CCSD&#8217;s funding source).  The UNCLOG Cambria letter cited above offers a unique way out for the county to their dilema &#8211; and it might save the CCSD (read: Cambria  residents) unnecessary expenses also.  It unfortunately is past the time for Cambrians to realize just how large their liabilty might be if they continue to ignore the facts, but now be the time to wake up.  We all must wait to see what happens with the UNCLOG appeal &#8211; should the CCSD inform us better about this situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deryl Robinson</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-29772</link>
		<dc:creator>Deryl Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=2279#comment-29772</guid>
		<description>Americans are all about getting someone else to pay or carry the burden these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are all about getting someone else to pay or carry the burden these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camron</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2009/07/19/a-question-of-services-and-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-29716</link>
		<dc:creator>Camron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=2279#comment-29716</guid>
		<description>Interesting. It&#039;s amazing  the vocal minority zero-growthers have never understood the importance of the build-out reduction plan which is the only way Cambria can permanantly and legally control the ultimate population. The community has a chance to buy up lots so cheap right now but too many dont want to pay their own way. I assume they think if the building can just be delayed in their lifetime that is good enough for them.Let future generations worry about and pay for it(just like Congress thinks). They can&#039;t possibly and honestly believe the right to build in Cambria ended after their home was built.Let&#039;s get going on buying up the buildable lots while we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. It&#8217;s amazing  the vocal minority zero-growthers have never understood the importance of the build-out reduction plan which is the only way Cambria can permanantly and legally control the ultimate population. The community has a chance to buy up lots so cheap right now but too many dont want to pay their own way. I assume they think if the building can just be delayed in their lifetime that is good enough for them.Let future generations worry about and pay for it(just like Congress thinks). They can&#8217;t possibly and honestly believe the right to build in Cambria ended after their home was built.Let&#8217;s get going on buying up the buildable lots while we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
