<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where We Gonna put that Cell Tower?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aboutcambria.com/2008/05/14/where-we-gonna-put-that-cell-tower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2008/05/14/where-we-gonna-put-that-cell-tower/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=where-we-gonna-put-that-cell-tower</link>
	<description>Cambria Pines by the Sea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne winburn</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2008/05/14/where-we-gonna-put-that-cell-tower/comment-page-1/#comment-2850</link>
		<dc:creator>anne winburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 18:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=368#comment-2850</guid>
		<description>I have some concerns that I have never seen an illustration of what the actual installation will look like. At the very least, we are entitled/should require to see a rendering of what is being proposed. How can we possibly intelligently review the proposals without the actual visual representation of what we are supporting?

Anyone know where I can find a rendering of the proposed facitlities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some concerns that I have never seen an illustration of what the actual installation will look like. At the very least, we are entitled/should require to see a rendering of what is being proposed. How can we possibly intelligently review the proposals without the actual visual representation of what we are supporting?</p>
<p>Anyone know where I can find a rendering of the proposed facitlities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Webb</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2008/05/14/where-we-gonna-put-that-cell-tower/comment-page-1/#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=368#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>There is no law that say we have to have cell phones for crying out loud. For those who must have a cell phone in town - use Charter. It works everywhere.  

Please take into consideration that it is not just one antenna - it&#039;s several antennas, five 160 sf. buildings, a maintenance road, traffic in a residential area etc etc etc.  There isn&#039;t enough room at some of the sites you mention above for these facilities. Pine Knolls water tank site is built up as much as it can be without violating a conservation easement.  Some of the sites you mention above do not have the allowable uses for Cell Phone cites. Are the sites you are mentioning agreeing to build five buildings on their properties?  

The fiscally responsible way to ask the question would be to only include sites that are allowed in your question so we&#039;re not wasting our time making a decision that cannot be implemented, or will have to be appealed down the road - again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no law that say we have to have cell phones for crying out loud. For those who must have a cell phone in town &#8211; use Charter. It works everywhere.  </p>
<p>Please take into consideration that it is not just one antenna &#8211; it&#8217;s several antennas, five 160 sf. buildings, a maintenance road, traffic in a residential area etc etc etc.  There isn&#8217;t enough room at some of the sites you mention above for these facilities. Pine Knolls water tank site is built up as much as it can be without violating a conservation easement.  Some of the sites you mention above do not have the allowable uses for Cell Phone cites. Are the sites you are mentioning agreeing to build five buildings on their properties?  </p>
<p>The fiscally responsible way to ask the question would be to only include sites that are allowed in your question so we&#8217;re not wasting our time making a decision that cannot be implemented, or will have to be appealed down the road &#8211; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Martin</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2008/05/14/where-we-gonna-put-that-cell-tower/comment-page-1/#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/?p=368#comment-2537</guid>
		<description>As a resident of Cambria for more that 15 years, I have had a terrible time with cell reception. The question at hand is where the cell tower should go. I seems to me that if the CCSD is so hard up for cash than put it on their land. Get the CCSD another revenue besides our hard earned money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a resident of Cambria for more that 15 years, I have had a terrible time with cell reception. The question at hand is where the cell tower should go. I seems to me that if the CCSD is so hard up for cash than put it on their land. Get the CCSD another revenue besides our hard earned money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

