<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recent Coastal Commission Meeting Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aboutcambria.com/2007/12/16/recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2007/12/16/recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video</link>
	<description>Cambria Pines by the Sea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Plan? &#124; About Cambria</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2007/12/16/recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Plan? &#124; About Cambria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/2007/12/16/recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>[...] the project is stalled once again. (View the most recent denial by the Coastal Commission at their December meeting.)  I am not a CCSD director nor am I staff. I have read nearly every word of the documents related to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project is stalled once again. (View the most recent denial by the Coastal Commission at their December meeting.)  I am not a CCSD director nor am I staff. I have read nearly every word of the documents related to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte</title>
		<link>http://aboutcambria.com/2007/12/16/recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboutcambria.com/2007/12/16/recent-coastal-commission-meeting-video/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Gregg Sanders has stated we have no other choice - but desal.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cambriacsd.org/Library/Website/services/engineering/Task4:LongtermAssessment/Section8_Fnl_Longterm_8.23.04.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Please Read Section 8 Detailed Evaluation of Selected Alternatives,
of Task 4, &lt;/a&gt; of the Water Master Plan found on CCSD web site.

In this section an Overview of Potential Water Supply Alternatives
 eight (8) alternatives, including desal  are evaluated according
to 7 criteria.   Statements in the report, the level of detail, the time when the evaluation was performed, and the scope and age of previous studies upon which this evaluation was based clearly intimate this decision was not made on a &quot;level playing field.&quot; 

There is a lot of technical info, but buried in this report are the following:

1.  The names of possible potential water supplies
2.  The list of required permits 
3.   A cost analysis for each project
4.   Projected time, including construction, permitting and agreements
      with the total time estimated from start to finish to bring the project  
      on line.

Its weighty  stuff, but please wade through it.  After getting through
Section 8, give your brain a rest and then read all of TASK 4.  You will find it all very enlightning.  You can also decide if Mr. Sanders is right with his statement, &quot;we have no choice but desal.&quot;

Charlotte Darehshori</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregg Sanders has stated we have no other choice &#8211; but desal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cambriacsd.org/Library/Website/services/engineering/Task4:LongtermAssessment/Section8_Fnl_Longterm_8.23.04.pdf" rel="nofollow">Please Read Section 8 Detailed Evaluation of Selected Alternatives,<br />
of Task 4, </a> of the Water Master Plan found on CCSD web site.</p>
<p>In this section an Overview of Potential Water Supply Alternatives<br />
 eight (8) alternatives, including desal  are evaluated according<br />
to 7 criteria.   Statements in the report, the level of detail, the time when the evaluation was performed, and the scope and age of previous studies upon which this evaluation was based clearly intimate this decision was not made on a &#8220;level playing field.&#8221; </p>
<p>There is a lot of technical info, but buried in this report are the following:</p>
<p>1.  The names of possible potential water supplies<br />
2.  The list of required permits<br />
3.   A cost analysis for each project<br />
4.   Projected time, including construction, permitting and agreements<br />
      with the total time estimated from start to finish to bring the project<br />
      on line.</p>
<p>Its weighty  stuff, but please wade through it.  After getting through<br />
Section 8, give your brain a rest and then read all of TASK 4.  You will find it all very enlightning.  You can also decide if Mr. Sanders is right with his statement, &#8220;we have no choice but desal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Charlotte Darehshori</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

